I've a problem with films that so heavily bank on a particular theme but provide no technical background about it and do not make an attempt to weave it into the main plot. In this case, it’s the game of "Teen Patti" (a reduced form of Poker, I believe). Replace the gambling background with any other field in which the protagonist is an expert and voila we have another film - Fixing of games in sports, organ trade…o-kay I'm getting crude, but you see what I mean. There is absolutely no attempt at showing us how the game or the system around it works. I'm not asking for a lesson, but I should know the writers are actually interested in their film's premise.
Without those details, to me the master plan just looked like peeping into other people's cards and figuring out who has a better hand. Some genius. There is ample attempt at making it look and sound interesting, with rugged and glamorous sets as needed. And with psycho-babble about life, happiness and sundry. But that's all it remains a trial - which did not work.
The only thing which worked is Amitabh Bachchan's acting, but then, when is the last time it didn't? And why would I want to watch a film for that when there are so many other options with the same feature. The rest of the cast including R. Madhavan who usually does a very good job of convincing us of his character, is shudder-inducing.
Anyway, it's not like there are very well-written characters. And this, despite all of them being gray. None of them are outright villainous and they surely don’t aspire to be heroic. They are each given a non-caricature-like distinguishing feature, but this isn't taken any further. No details, no nuances. They did know we are going to take objection to the woman being used only for her form and be treated as more or less brainless.
Thankfully, the team of students who are making careers in gambling aren't shown as professional thugs who get it right from the word go. They try to maintain balance, with each of the team members going wrong in their plans and getting them all in trouble. But it soon becomes a pattern that you can easily see through. And the whole justification of carrying on one silly scheme after the other is pretty bonkers too.
The basic, basic premise is taken from 21. Of course, the makers wanted to feel creative, so the protagonist and the sub-plots are changed around. Too little, in the early, the middle and the latter parts too. Only it gets more and more fragmented and ridiculous as it progresses towards the climax.
There ain't no meat in the concept, the story, or the sub-plots. The only thing that keeps it going from being a complete write-off is Amitabh Bachchan's acting. Is that enough? This once, it doesn't look like it.
- meetu, a part of the audience
Comments (6)
So, you mean to say, its not even as good as half the original - 21 - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0478087/
posted 6 months, 1 week ago@Brajeshwar Actually its not an exact remake of 21, but the base concept comes from there. In any which ways, it is certainly worse than 21, not that 21 was VERY good.
posted 6 months, 1 week agoI really thought this movie was gonna be like 21 with Kevin Spacey - the way it started out at least...
With Big B in the movie that bumps the lead actor to at least a 3.
Nice Review....
Interval.in - Watch Movies, Chat with Fans, Chill with Friends
Dekho.in - Bollywood Social Network
posted 6 months agoI am really SAD that Amitabh Bachchan has degraded his value and doing this kind of movie. I am also shocked that producers are wasting money on this kind of movie. -100 rating for the movie!
posted 6 months agoTill when Mr. AB is going to experiment?
Dont understand why he has done some really awful movies like Darna Jaroori hai and Ram Gopal Varma ki Aag.....
posted 3 months agoWell Rummy, don't you think it is only now that he can actually afford to experiment. Along with Aks and Paa you are bound to get some misses. I too wish all his experiments worked, but doubt that can actually happen.
posted 3 months agoLeave a new comment