Many a time, storywriters use stories to put across their ideologies before their audience. Now, the writing style might be great, or at the very least likable. But, if a reader/viewer doesn't subscribe to the ideology, the writer has lost that one member of the audience. And with Bhoothnath, I am that member. I was a captive audience till it started beating the well-trodden path of stereotypes and meddling with religious issues.
What I call religious issues actually borderlines on faith. Especially, if the specific Hindu rite mentioned is only symbolic of the idea that parents only need a gesture of acceptance, of love. While, it might not be far-fetched, I doubt that is what too many viewers will take away. The point being that instead of imposing religious traditions by using a particular practice as an example, if a larger, more global sub-plot was chosen, the point might have gotten through better.
A lot of the blame could also go to the absolutely unforeseeable slack in pace and change in execution style. From creative and cute use of otherwise-oft-seen special effects, we are sent to a second half where the magical treats do a vanishing act. From a fun, adorable chain of events, we are suddenly thrown into a rather gloomy outlook of society. From a first half with two fairly well developed characters, we are abruptly introduced to new characters and their half-baked relationships post-interval.
Fortunately though, the performances do not suffer from this inconsistency. Amitabh Bachchan plays the grandfatherly ghost, Bhoothnath, who won't let anyone stay in his house even though only his spirit can inhabit it. His comic timing is as impeccable as ever. Not to worry, Amitabh fans - the funny faces, the angst of a person who is worried for someone close, the grief-stricken eyes at the memory of a painful event - all are very much there, the debacle called RGV ki Aag hasn't taken any of it away from him. The only area where he came across as superficial was when the angry ol' man was required to be angry. Sad but true.
Anyway, looks like little Aman, who plays naughty Banku, has taken a leaf or more from the veteran's book. Every time Aman Siddiqui came on screen, I couldn't take my eyes off his eyes - such innocence, such twinkle, such sadness - as and how the story demanded. Same goes for Juhi Chawla who plays her cheerful self, this time as a mother with an unbelievable sense of humor. But come scenes that require her to be anxious and her glycerinated eyes make her work seem effortless.
I usually refrain from commenting on the special appearances, but Shah Rukh Khan's presence was a little more than just a special appearance. It wouldn't be unfair to say that he had more screen presence than some of the other side characters. Shah Rukh Khan plays Shah Rukh Khan Banku's father. The significance attached to his character's deeds seem like the parts have been forcibly blown-up to fit in the stature of the star. Now, whether he succeeds in performing his role of first-weekend promotional material, the box office will tell in a couple of days.
Anyhow, after a long, long time Satish Shah and Rajpal Yadav actually made me laugh. But where did they disappear in the latter half of the movie. And there start my complaints. Keep in mind that I let go of the usual issue related to non-defined super-powers. As in, why does Bhoothnath show himself, if he doesn't want to be seen?
So, every time, I saw a cool usage of graphics, I hoped that they won't overdo it, and they didn’t. I was happy. Every time, it looked like the story is going to go into predictable zone, an unexpected line brought out loud laughter. I was happy. I thoroughly enjoyed the comment on TV soap operas. Things were going really well till my questions started getting answered.
Then, I asked, "Where's the conflict?" There it came, not good, not bad...a little longer and this would have become too serious to match the tone of the movie so far. "Where's Bhoothnath's backstory? What's his problem?" And I asked for too much. The movie blindly nosedived into new characters with 45 minutes to go. One of them is Bhoothnath's son, who not only is introduced so late, but has a full character arc, rapid transition et al, albeit very under-developed. I found the little speeches a little too boring and the stereotype against Indian emigrants a bit too harsh. Ultimately, the resolution to the story as a whole was the biggest let-down of them all.
All said and done, Bhoothnath surely deserves credit for not taking its younger target audience for granted. Well executed "tributes" to the animation used in the Harry Potter series, ensures that the kids get a quality product. If only, they had maintained it through to the end, if only...
- meetu, a part of the audience
Comments (11)
Bhoothnath...
The thing that attracts me most these days to movies with superstars in them is the curiosity about the script they have chosen....
[...] liked Bhoothnath but felt it came apart at the end. Meetu agrees that “the first half-second half syndrome strikes again“. She particularly disliked the use of religious issues in the second [...]
you should check out my version of the bhoothnath movie review http://star-warrz.blogspot.com. Pls leave you feedback.
Wow, Rakesh, you are really something! You first copy from here and then ask me to leave a comment on your site. So I left my comment on your site.
Now your turn... STOP PLAGIARIZING!!!!
hi,
no you got me wrong. my review is a modified version of the review on rediff and i also gave them credit for it.
i would suggest you read it again http://star-warrz.blogspot.com
@Rakesh yeah, right! Without linking to the article!! Deleting a few words/sentences here and there doesn't make it 'your' review...And is that why you deleted my comment from your site - because you are so confident its 'your' review!?
I know it isn't my post you have COPIED, but the very concept of just copy, paste, delete words/rephrase-using-the-same-phrases is sickening!!
Temper temper Meetu. Why do u give so much space to such irrelevant people.
Just edit his comment and remove the links from it n he'll get the msg.
Thanks, Sudhir! But I really have had enough of these people who copy. If I just deleted, other readers wouldn't know he is copying and deleting comments that are pointing that out.
[...] film certainly feels padded and dreary??? See full review: Hanumant Bhansali , Radio Sargam Rating:http://withoutgivingthemovieaway.com/main/bhoothnath-to-each-his-own/Review - Namastey London » without giving the movie awayLidia Ostepeev, planet bollywood [...]
BHOOTHNATH was a lot of fun and, a few mildly "spicy" dance bits involving Amitabh Bachchan and Aman Siddiqui with scantily-clad ladies aside, could play unedited on The Disney Channel over here in the US. We started calling it "Ghost Grandpa", and wondering what a weekly television series version of it would look like....
The main cast of Bachchan, Siddiqui and Juihi Chawla was doing such a great job with the plot that yeah, I kind of wondered what Shahrukh Khan was doing there in what amounted to a glorified cameo. (To us, it would be like seeing Tom Cruise show up in SPY KIDS as a neighbor Dad starting a carpool - it sort of yanks the movie out of shape having a major star in a minor non-"star turn" role.) Did he owe the producers or Bachchan a favor? Did he need a quick couple Crores for a day or two's work? Did he wander onto the wrong set, and just went along with it? Personally, I like the last explanation best - "You mean, this isn't OM SHANTI OM 2? Bloody Hell - and I was about to take my shirt off, too!" ;)
@meetu - Since Bollywood movies usually front-load their fun comic stuff in the first half, and start getting "darker" after the Intermission, I accepted all the drama coming up near the end as a storytelling convention. We liked that it was more than just light silliness all the way through - that he was a proud stubborn traditional old Indian man who felt abandoned ::and I think I'm treading into spoiler territory here!:: The religious ceremony that bothers you is, as I said about 1920, a trope of supernatural movies in every culture - and I found it significant that ::wow - not giving away the ending is hard !::
Anyway, I think you may be a bit more concerned about the religious aspects than most audiences are, meetu. Or perhaps, as Western viewers in a predominantly Christian culture (though we have Buddhist, Hinduist and Muslim places of worship in the Upstate New York city I live in now, as befits our large Central Asian population), we can watch movies featuring rituals of religions not our own with interest rather than rage over perceived blasphemy.
@TimELiebe I don't think the religious rituals were blasphemous either here or in 1920. Honestly, I couldn't care. For me the worry is that it could be perceived as blasphemous by people who do care and distract from the film. It could also go a step further, if the balance is tipped even a bit, if a particular religious group took offense and took action like causing physical damage to another religious group. I could be catastrophizing - it's only a movie after all - but lesser known mediums have known to cause trouble. I wonder if movies should actively avoid that?
Leave a new comment