34 reviewers have given Welcome to Sajjanpur an average rating of 3.9/5.0 (?)
Warning: clicking on "full review" will take you to an external website that could contain spoilers.
Thumbs up by Sanskriti Media, AOL INDIA ...The innocence of the villagers stands in stark contrast to the cunning attitude of the educated city.... full review
Thumbs up by Nikhil Kumar, Apun Ka Choice ...Amrita Rao is gracefully restrained. Ila Arun is perfectly cast. Divya Dutta is brilliant in a small role.... full review
Thumbs up by Daliya Daspurkayastha, Bollywood Mantra ...Songs are not so effective. The director can do without songs too.... full review
Thumbs up by Rony D'Costa, BOXOFFICE INDIA ...If you think good comedy is a film like Welcome then you are not Welcome to Sajjanpur.... full review
Thumbs up by Sanjay Ram, Business of Cinema ...a well etched satire of sorts about things on and gone in a land we call our own... full review
So-So by Anand Vaishnav, Buzz18 ...The rest of the supporting cast stay true to their characters with each actor delivering spirited performances... full review
Thumbs up by Aniruddha Basu, DearCinema ...Truth be told when Benegal tries to get sentimental and serious the film stumbles... full review
Thumbs down by Angel Rani, Deccan Herald ...the Benegal touch slowly loses its warmth. Songs with no sense of time don’t help either.... full review
Thumbs up by Aniruddha Guha, DNA ...you are left amused at the antics of Mahadev and other villagers, the fresh, witty dialogues and double entrendes that are presented in a sophisticated manner... full review
Thumbs up by Shubhra Gupta, Express India ...the film is saved from becoming the sort of dreaded preachy treatises that the director has been delivering of late.... full review
Thumbs up by Martin D'Souza, Glamsham.com ...Never once does the actor go overboard, nor does the director take liberties with his creative freedom.... full review
Thumbs up by Khalid Mohamed, Hindustan Times ...the spine of Shyam Benegal’s Welcome to Sajjanpur is its rustic, colloquial dialogue.... full review
Thumbs up by Rajeev Masand, IBN Live ...And what a colorful palette of characters Benegal serves up... full review
Thumbs up by Taran Adarsh, IndiaFM ...Expect no glitz-n-glam here. In fact, it doesn't even have a strong plot since it's a character-driven film... full review
Thumbs up by Gaurav Malani, indiatimes ...dialogues deserve a special mention for an authentic rustic feel of the countryside and simultaneously having a witty punch in almost every second line... full review
Thumbs up by Janhvi Patel, indya.com ...The sets, clothes and language lend authenticity to the film... full review
So-So by Amit R Agarwal, merinews ...the climax seems to be a rushed up job... full review
Thumbs down by Mr. Inkenti, Mr. Inketis Weblog ...none of the characters or their stories are weaved well and they just keep coming and going... full review
Thumbs up by Meena Iyer, Mumbai Mirror ...Ashok Mishra's screenplay is smooth for most parts; but there's a point when the tempo of the film dips a bit.... full review
Thumbs up by Anupama Chopra, NDTV ...Benegal has a great affection for his characters—even the unwholesome ones have their share of memorable lines... full review
So-So by Jahan Bakshi, Now Running.com ...People expecting too much out of Shyam Benegal, considering his past body of work are bound to be disappointed.... full review
So-So by Ashok Nayak, Now Running.com ...His experience and talent as a director is evident in his very first attempt in a new genre.... full review
Thumbs up by Subhash K Jha, Now Running.com ...In a film flush with accomplished performances, Talpade holds the plot together like a voluminous book's spine... full review
Thumbs up by Phoenixnu, Passion for Cinema ...Not sure when was the last time any hindi film made me laugh so much.... full review
Thumbs down by rusted rick, Passion for Cinema ...He could have easily made a thousand social campaign ads from the various stories, which might have struck the audience in a better way.... full review
Thumbs down by Sulakshana Biswas, Passion for Cinema ...I refuse to believe that Welcome To Sajjanpur is a film by Shyam Benegal;... full review
Thumbs up by Tushar, Passion for Cinema ...nice to see the master break the divides we put so comfortably on cinema.... full review
Thumbs up by Goher Iqbal Punn, Radio Sargam ...The film loses some values also i.e. the movie should have been without a song because the film does not need to have a song into the narrative... full review
So-So by Sukanya Verma, Rediff ...Welcome to Sajjanpur didn't really need any songs, let alone so many of them.... full review
So-So by Sonia Chopra, Sify Movies ...While the entire film aims at making you laugh, very few scenes succeed.... full review
Thumbs up by Nikhat Kazmi, Times of India ...you do miss the stark realism and the social concerns of his earlier films. But hey, hasn't the national mood changed too?... full review
So-So by The ThirdMan, Upper Stall ...After a rousing crane shot taking in the village, the camera is thereafter largely static and plays very little role in effective story telling... full review
Thumbs up by Spicezee Bureau, ZEENEWS.COM ...explores the human mind with Mahadev’s change of heart and subsequent liberation.... full review
Comments (24)
Hey, read your review and your review seems to be predominantly negative, but still you have given the film a good rating overall.
I found the film tedious, a cross between a DD social serial and a Films Division documentary.
So yes, Mr. Benegal is a known nationalist at least from his filmography and here is yet another attempt to make a rural film which would appeal to the multiplex audience.
But does it work?
What you get is a squeaky clean village, ostensibly Ramoji Rao film city, which exists in never never land, and is not real. And the characters are stereotypes, the goon turned politician, the letter writer with a heart of gold, the romantic compounder, the feisty independent girl who wants to work, and the wife in waiting for her absent husband. That is it, one line summarizes the characters in the script. What else is there about them; in a village for eg there would be caste as the most important factor. What makes them what they are, we come to know nothing. They are props that is it for the story to move, and what is the story, a romance that is fated to remain half baked?
The only "real" character is that of the transgender Munnibhai, but even there we see just a very limited side of her. Nothing else is explored.
The director has thrown in everything from power cuts to sms's and the scenes seem to be written for the lines and the message rather than the other way around which results in a script which just plods around, with a few songs thrown in for good measure!
Yes, the film does have its moments, the dialogues are for the most crisp, and Amrita Rao has done a good job and so has the actor playing the Transgender(Ravi Jhankal I think). Shreyas Talpade needs to move away from the cute, chocolate, ever smiling boy roles and do something serious for a change, his sweet boy acting gets terribly irritating.
The best of Benegal's films have been intense / satirical. This film has neither the intensity nor the satirical punch.
I mean if you want to laud it just because it has a rural theme, go ahead, but otherwise it disappoints.
And yes, I completely forgot, the film harps so much on democracy, ha ha through another stereotype, the army subedar! We even have one song thrown in for that!
I liked Munnibhai's song the best.
http://chavannichap.blogspot.com/2008/09/blog-post_368.html
That is your best review ever meetu
I really liked that gag on the sms forwarding
superstition.
I really liked the movie.
I watched this movie Sunday late night with my parents.
I noticed that the film was still titled Mahadev ka Sajjanpur in the Censor certificate
I told my mum that the movie's old name
"Mahadev ka Sajjanpur"
or was it
"Sajjanpur ka Mahadev"
I thought that if it was about Mahadev , than it should be "Sajjanpur ka Mahadev", but I was so sure it was "Mahadev ka Sajjanpur"
After the movie
when I was changing into my nightclothes at my home,
it struck me.
Shyam Benegal, YOU ARE A GENIUS!!!!
I really think he purposely publicized the movie in its old name for some time.
Very Well written film ..only for mature people who want entertainment with logic..Very Nice film 5 star rating .doesnt deserve Indian Audience. Most of them will like to have fun. but it shows the roots of our culture where we come from and if we do want a change in our systems ..then where to start from . Also highlights the Power of the PEN. as it can change anybody's life.
This is a film about a writer, his limtations and how he can bring a good or bad change within a society.
@ Cinefreak, I try my best not to be inconsistent. I'm sorry, if I sound that way. I certainly liked the movie, and like always, despite its faults.
The village is squeaky clean, because it is Mahadev's idolized view of his village.
The letter-writer is not with a heart of gold. He is manipulating the life of the woman he loves to the best possible manner. He does things out of fear, he lies.
A romance that is half-broken, is that not real? Would have liked a hunky-dory happy ending?
"the scenes seem to be written for the lines and the message rather than the other way around"
Yeah because it is a novel written by a person from a village who doesn't have training in novel-writing. He's just writing where his emotions lie.
I'm not lauding it because it has a rural theme. The satire worked for me, especially because it wasn't preachy.
Every time democracy is mentioned it is very sarcastic.
@ Arpit, thanks! And yeah, for me one of the main reasons the movie worked is because of the concept in the climax. It was rushed, but it makes you rethink about what was fictional and what was reality in the last 2 hours.
@Paras, glad you enjoyed it!
OK folks; This is the first I read a detailed review before watching a movie. Now that I had already bought tickets for this Sunday (befor reading the review); you will find me come back and add my notes ; see you in <100 hrs.
cool Vivek, so what was your take?
What an useless review. This article don't even say properly what the story is before giving your opiniom.
Hi Meetu, Sprry could not update sooner; though I have taken some notes on the day.
PS: Ramkumar - if the review was to write the complete story; then what is the use of seeing ANY movie;
Anyways, coming back to my views on the movie; slick direction; editing could have been better on some counts (especially Mahadev's interaction with a couple of characters; I feel the end was also suddenly rushed; compared to the comfortable pace of the rest of the movie.
Rajeshwari just does not fit the bill (and infact neither does Ila Arun); It may have been better to swap Rajeshwari and Divya's roles.
I quite liked the clever use of songs in the film (except maybe the initial one - Sitaram); and the deliberate narration style to keep the interest level.
Overall quite good as expected. Thanks for this Movie Shyam; and Thanks meetu for the useful insights.
Thanks, vivek!
And Ramkumar...what can I say man...I just don't like writing about the story!
Hey, read your review and your review seems to be predominantly negative, but still you have given the film a good rating overall. I found the film tedious, a cross between a DD social serial and a Films Division documentary. So yes, Mr. Benegal is a known nationalist at least from his filmography and here is yet another attempt to make a rural film which would appeal to the multiplex audience. But does it work? What you get is a squeaky clean village, ostensibly Ramoji Rao film city, which exists in never never land, and is not real. And the characters are stereotypes, the goon turned politician, the letter writer with a heart of gold, the romantic compounder, the feisty independent girl who wants to work, and the wife in waiting for her absent husband. That is it, one line summarizes the characters in the script. What else is there about them; in a village for eg there would be caste as the most important factor. What makes them what they are, we come to know nothing. They are props that is it for the story to move, and what is the story, a romance that is fated to remain half baked? The only “real” character is that of the transgender Munnibhai, but even there we see just a very limited side of her. Nothing else is explored. The director has thrown in everything from power cuts to sms’s and the scenes seem to be written for the lines and the message rather than the other way around which results in a script which just plods around, with a few songs thrown in for good measure! Yes, the film does have its moments, the dialogues are for the most crisp, and Amrita Rao has done a good job and so has the actor playing the Transgender(Ravi Jhankal I think). Shreyas Talpade needs to move away from the cute, chocolate, ever smiling boy roles and do something serious for a change, his sweet boy acting gets terribly irritating. The best of Benegal’s films have been intense / satirical. This film has neither the intensity nor the satirical punch. I mean if you want to laud it just because it has a rural theme, go ahead, but otherwise it disappoints.
And yes, I completely forgot, the film harps so much on democracy, ha ha through another stereotype, the army subedar! We even have one song thrown in for that! I liked Munnibhai’s song the best.
That is your best review ever meetu I really liked that gag on the sms forwarding superstition.
I really liked the movie. I watched this movie Sunday late night with my parents. I noticed that the film was still titled Mahadev ka Sajjanpur in the Censor certificate I told my mum that the movie’s old name “Mahadev ka Sajjanpur” or was it “Sajjanpur ka Mahadev” I thought that if it was about Mahadev , than it should be “Sajjanpur ka Mahadev”, but I was so sure it was “Mahadev ka Sajjanpur” After the movie when I was changing into my nightclothes at my home, it struck me. Shyam Benegal, YOU ARE A GENIUS!!!! I really think he purposely publicized the movie in its old name for some time.
Very Well written film ..only for mature people who want entertainment with logic..Very Nice film 5 star rating .doesnt deserve Indian Audience. Most of them will like to have fun. but it shows the roots of our culture where we come from and if we do want a change in our systems ..then where to start from . Also highlights the Power of the PEN. as it can change anybody’s life. This is a film about a writer, his limtations and how he can bring a good or bad change within a society.
@ Cinefreak, I try my best not to be inconsistent. I’m sorry, if I sound that way. I certainly liked the movie, and like always, despite its faults. The village is squeaky clean, because it is Mahadev’s idolized view of his village. The letter-writer is not with a heart of gold. He is manipulating the life of the woman he loves to the best possible manner. He does things out of fear, he lies. A romance that is half-broken, is that not real? Would have liked a hunky-dory happy ending? “the scenes seem to be written for the lines and the message rather than the other way around” Yeah because it is a novel written by a person from a village who doesn’t have training in novel-writing. He’s just writing where his emotions lie. I’m not lauding it because it has a rural theme. The satire worked for me, especially because it wasn’t preachy. Every time democracy is mentioned it is very sarcastic. @ Arpit, thanks! And yeah, for me one of the main reasons the movie worked is because of the concept in the climax. It was rushed, but it makes you rethink about what was fictional and what was reality in the last 2 hours. @Paras, glad you enjoyed it!
OK folks; This is the first I read a detailed review before watching a movie. Now that I had already bought tickets for this Sunday (befor reading the review); you will find me come back and add my notes ; see you in <100 hrs.
cool Vivek, so what was your take?
What an useless review. This article don’t even say properly what the story is before giving your opiniom.
Hi Meetu, Sprry could not update sooner; though I have taken some notes on the day. PS: Ramkumar - if the review was to write the complete story; then what is the use of seeing ANY movie; Anyways, coming back to my views on the movie; slick direction; editing could have been better on some counts (especially Mahadev’s interaction with a couple of characters; I feel the end was also suddenly rushed; compared to the comfortable pace of the rest of the movie. Rajeshwari just does not fit the bill (and infact neither does Ila Arun); It may have been better to swap Rajeshwari and Divya’s roles. I quite liked the clever use of songs in the film (except maybe the initial one - Sitaram); and the deliberate narration style to keep the interest level. Overall quite good as expected. Thanks for this Movie Shyam; and Thanks meetu for the useful insights.
Thanks, vivek! And Ramkumar…what can I say man…I just don’t like writing about the story!
Is this where Prasoon Joshi got the "idea" for his "democracy" ad campaign for IDEA ? What an idea sirjee :(
Leave a new comment