Review - No Smoking: Fascinating!

wogma rating: Buy the DVD already (?)
quick review:

It is fascinating to go to a movie and not see a story but the picturization of an idea. The visualization then is just a starting point for the audience's imagination. My suggestion - don’t look for a linear description of events, look for how this idea, this concept takes shape.

Reviews

31753 views

Click on the tabs below for wogma review, external reviews, user reviews, and twitter verdict

Wogma Review

Update: The director has given his interpretation of the movie here. It is a very interesting read along with other interpretations here. Of course, these articles have spoilers. But, in my mind, it wouldn't matter much because even after reading these, you could come out with an interpretation of your own, if you go in with an open mind. Happy watching!

A four-letter expletive repeated thrice is what I am left with. In an excited tone. In an "I don't believe I just saw that in Hindi" tone. And most fascinatingly in an "It is beyond me to completely comprehend what I saw in one take" tone.

The beauty of abstract concepts is that there are almost as many meanings as there are viewers. What a paradox!? Something that is not obviously meaningful has many more meanings than a clear statement! Oh, did I just digress?

Coming to the point - the movie was a treat for the senses. The background music, sound design, camerawork, special effects - all worked towards narrating the idea. Nope, I cannot make myself say I saw a story; it was a visual description of an idea - a 'what if...?' Such cinema might not be the proverbial "everyone's cup of tea". But, the point is, it is now available for those who enjoy a different flavor. Thank you, Mr. Director!

John Abraham plays K and absolutely everything in the movie is from K's point of view. But, don't let that keep you away, even if you are wary of his acting skills. Because he is literally 'unbelievably' good. The transition from the self-obsessed, full-of-himself man to the person who has lost his grip was remarkable. Especially because this came through to us with his performance and not merely the lines given to him. However, we could have certainly survived without the animated thought bubbles. What exactly was their purpose? They were not funny, not insightful - especially since you could make out what John was thinking from his body language and movement of facial muscles (yes believe me, he can actually do that!).

It was a joy to watch Paresh Rawal not making a fool of himself. But his performance lacked a punch that the character demanded. A more powerful, more menacing "Sri Sri Sri ... baba" would have been great.

The dialogues are nice and crisp, and absent when not needed - leaving a lot of room for interpretation. At the very least a couple of metaphors to decipher. Especially, the commentary on the infinite self-improvement programmes resorted to these days.

Do any of the umpteen movie awards given out have a bravery award? I guess not. I think the time has come to start one and the first one should go to 'No smoking' Not just for the technical brilliance, but for the concept itself.

Sadly, though, it might not go down as well with too many people. And those who are exposed to world cinema, have seen similar stuff before. But, what I admire is that I was able to watch it in a theater that screens mainstream Hindi movies and there were people who applauded when the credits started rolling.

The question that I am still struggling with is - Would I have liked it as much if there were more obscure ideas translating into movies? Well, I'd say bring me more and we'll know!

- meeta, a part of the audience

No Smoking - Movie Details

No Smoking - Trailer

Comments (20)

Click here for new comment

No Smoking review | DesiPundit:

[...] enjoys Anurag Kashyap’s latest offering, No Smoking. Coming to the point - the movie was a treat for the senses. The background music, sound design, [...]

meetu:

Yeah sat, unfortunately the movie is being criticized negatively by most of the viewers. I guess, it is too metaphorical for people to appreciate.

I just hope this does not dissuade people from making more movies like these, where the audience is required to use their brains and imagination.

Arvind:

hi,

i just spotted the 'to each his own...' section. i don't know if you are aware of it, but the thumbs up and thumbs down ratings of movies is copyright - it is Roger Ebert's. I am not sure if you care too much about copyright but it is generally a good practice not to use someone else's copyright.

regards,
Arvind

meetu:

Morph, good to see you here again. So, we disagree yet again. No denying Vishal Bharadwaj a bravery award. It takes guts to do something that you are pretty sure you are going to be trashed for. In fact, they can make the trophy itself in the shape of a golden cigarette, to mark the movie that started it all...sorry, am getting carried away...


Morph and Ashish K. - "intelligent"? Hmmm...am not sure I want to label movies like that. But, if you are talking about a movie that makes you think. This certainly did make me think.


Ashish K. - Comments about Anurag Kashyap, don't know him so wouldn't know whether he is arrogant or not. I was watching the movie and not judging the personal traits of the director

Thanks for taking the time to leave a comment, guys!

meetu:

Arvind, thank you so much for pointing it out. I do take copyright and trademarks very seriously. Trademark to the phrase "Two Thumbs Up" is most certainly owned by Ebert and the estate of Sieskel. This was done to avoid misrepresentation by movie-makers. However, the terms "Thumbs Up" and "Thumbs Down" are not trademarked. Reference article

I really appreciate your concern. And good to hear from you again.

meetu:

Anna, I certainly hope so too. I am as glad as you that at least some people liked the movie and are voicing their opinions.

Mudit, I want to see it again too!! I am sure I will come out with more admiration for the movie.

Arvind:

terrific. i am satisfied with the answer. thank you for clarifying.
i'll be back(not copyrighted by Arnold Schwarzenegger).

meetu:

wow Puneet! I was wondering, that though the movie is not about 'smoking' or 'no smoking', how smokers would react to it. Thanks for providing your take.

Well, you should consider watching it alone, if you don't find company.

Thanks for sharing your reaction.

To Each Its Own » Archives » Review No:

[...] good friend [...]

DesiDabba » Archives » Review No Smoki:

[...] good friend [...]

No Smoking - Review and more « A Fine Imbala:

[...] http://withoutgivingthemovieaway.com/main/reviews/review-no-smoking/ [...]

No Smoking - Reviews and More « Full2 Faltu:

[...] http://withoutgivingthemovieaway.com/main/reviews/review-no-smoking/ [...]

meetu:

Hi TinuAnand, sorry to disappoint you. I might consider having a qualification for the rating. The issue is, that I am not a big fan of conditional opinion. I think an opinion is an opinion. I feel, saying something like - Must watch "if" you have a taste for artistic movies - copping out or cheating your readers.

Nevertheless, you might soon see a qualifier along with the rating, when required.

Apoorv Khatreja:

Here is my own interpretation of the movie, and some common things which people couldn't get, cleared up.

http://apoorvkhatreja.blogspot.com/2007/12/no-smoking-uncovered.html

meetu:

Interesting take Apoorv, and interesting blog too. Read a couple posts. Keep visiting!

babu mathew:

anurag had picturised a marvellous story(beat hollywood!!!) with some kind of confusion which may not reach normal"masala lovers"!.But people like me,i am sure,would have definitely enjoyed it.I wont critisice it,but say frankly,that at some place in the movie,i really felt miserable.How's the mechanical finger going in?How could paresh have the video of all the smokers?.But apart from these, i loved the screenplay,cinematography,background score and etc.Please... Anurag dont stop making films like these...people like me really need films like this kind..carry on...duniya to kehti hi rahti hai...

Navin:

@mainak, meetu is on vacation until Monday. Hopefully she will reply in a day or two after she comes back.

meetu:

@ mainak, one has to understand and accept one's limitations. I don't understand the psychoanalysis parts completely and would be lost if I had to counter-argue...thus stayed silent on that aspect.

Cheating Girlfriend:

She was hot but pretty stupid... I should have known better.

flowers:

I read your reviews because you analyze movies based on entertainment to mass audience. Now you are reviewing more like what other reviewers do. Ironically thats what this film all about!

Leave a new comment