no gossip, no scandals.
movie reviews ... and more
wogma tip: Don't like wogma reviews? No problemo! Leave your opinion, add your rating for films and write your 100-character review in the comments section.

I am Kalam - Notepad

I am Kalam

wogma rating: Add to 'must watch' list (?)
quick review: I am Kalam charmingly visualizes the life of a little boy who has to work to sustain himself and his family. Its simplicity is works as both an advantage and a disadvantage. The easy-going narrative is a pleasant watch but too-good-to-be-true plot is distracting.

This page has additional observations, other than the ones noted in the main review.

Plot Summary

9-10 year-old Chhotu works at a roadside dhaba. He is enthusiastic about life but is pulled down by the people around him.

What Worked

  • Close-up shot of marbles.
  • The Karni Maata temple as a choice for one of the locations.

What did not

Note: This section simply lists the things that I did not like in this movie. This is not the overall impression about this movie. Please read the full review here

  • The random use of Rajasthani (marwadi) words.
  • The philosophy about changing times being talked over a game of chess. Very arbitrary.
  • How can a teacher ask a 9-10 year old boy to prepare for an "inter-school" competition by himself, just one day in advance?
  • Why was Rannvijay Singh walking like he had hurt his back? Or was he imitating the style in which his father might have walked?!

I am Kalam - Movie Details

I am Kalam - Trailer

If you cannot see a video above, click here to see it on YouTube

I am Kalam - All reviews summary

External Reviews

40 reviewers have given I am Kalam an average rating of 4.4/5.0. 34 yays, 3 nays, 3 so-so. See all external reviews »

Twitter Reviews

On twitter, 85 twitterers have given I am Kalam an average rating of 4.9/5.0. 84 yays, 1 nays, 0 so-so. See all tweets »

Readers' Ratings

1 readers have given I am Kalam an average rating of 5/5.0. 1 yays, 0 nays, 0 so-so. See all reader reviews »

Comments (3)

Saurabh Sengupta:

loved this movie

Garud:

The rating system is a bit misleading. Practically every critic has given the film 3 - 3.5 rating, yet the average critic rating is 4.4/5. Is this the average of the star ratings or just an average of counting the yays, nays and so-so's - with every yay meaning the same regardless of star rating?

I believe it's the latter case. In which case, a film with many raving reviews (e.g. ten 5-star reviews and one 2-star review), and one or two negative reviews would fare worse than a film with all mildly good reviews (e.g. ten 3.5-star reviews). But in reality the former film will be the one most people raved about while the latter one everyone just gave a cursory nod to.

You must explain somewhere how the ratings are calculated on this site.

meetu:

@Garud you are right. The problem is that not all reviewers give stars, so I needed to come up with a scheme that gave an overall opinion of a film. I could not make it on a scale of 5 because for the ones that do not have a rating, it would be very difficult for me to judge whether the reviewer felt that the film was a 2.5 or a 3 or a 3.5. Hence, this in-between.

And yes, I should have a page that describes how this rating is arrived at. Will get on it soon. Thanks.

Leave a new comment