A true villain doesn't have any attachments and is pretty much soulless. Why he wants to achieve ALL, no one knows, but that's all he wants - achieve all. The lack of reason instills fear in both his enemies and the audience. Kancha (Sanjay Dutt) is that truly detached villain and Viju (Hrithik Roshan) is trying to get there. Every time he commits a murder, you see a weight of sadness in Viju's eyes, which reminds us that his parents wouldn't approve. That difference is what makes the audience root for Viju while dreading Kancha. And this polarity in emotions for the characters makes Agneepath a watch well-worth the time and money.
The only charm of 1990's Agneepath was in watching Vijay Dinanath Chauhan struggle between his father's ideology which became intrinsic to him and how he thought the world really needs to be dealt with; between seeking his mother's, thus the 'good' world's approval and knowing only one way to avenge his father's death. 22 years later, this struggle has been blunted. Yet, the charm has taken new form. His single-minded focus on seeking redemption in revenge takes you through almost t-h-r-e-e hours of watching a film. In this SMS age that, in itself, is a huge achievement.
It can be argued that a couple of songs could've been done away with, but that is exactly what Agneepath takes rightly from the 90s style of film-making. Build tension, break tension with some good-sounding music and lyrics, build tension within the said song to keep the story from stalling and let it beak with another intense/action sequence. This tempo worked very well then and from the way it's done here, can live on if used by the right hands. Sure, there is nostalgia hidden there, so I'm really interested in seeing how the generation, which hasn't grown up on that style, reacts.
Enter Hrithik Roshan. While his "star" value will rope in enough audiences from Gen-X, he's very unlikely to remind the previous generation of Amitabh Bachchan. That won't be because he hasn't done a good job, that he has, but because director, Karan Malhotra's interpretation of Vijay Dinanath Chauhan is so different. So intense is his gaze and so serious his demeanour in his first hour of screen-time that you feel relief and joy when you see him smile.
Priyanka Chopra must've known when she signed the film that all she, like her character, Kaali, is required to do is lend support. She plays the simple girl with simple needs role to perfection. The backdrop Kaali grew up in grants enough leeway to make her, cheesy, silly, smitten-in-love character, adorable. Similarly, it's good to see Kancha (Sanjay Dutt) have that slight change to his background which gives him additional motivation to be in love with that particular village. Yet, I wish his character was less dramatic. The madness he represents made him into a caricature and thus a tad bit comical. This stands out even worse because none of the other characters are really cartoon sketches.
And we know, with the underworld, drugs and body-trading as a backdrop there is enough scope for mockery. A ready and available character was that played by Rishi Kapoor, Lala. Through most of the film, you forget you are watching one star after another, but when you see Rishi Kapoor beating and being beaten up by Hrithik Roshan, a certain line is crossed and you suddenly realize the intensity of what's going on on-screen. A moment is created, even if it is not the pleasant kind.
I also liked the moments that the makers chose to keep from the original like the one with Viju and his mother having dinner or the one when Viju visits Officer Gaitonde's house. Also, some new moments were created like the one where Viju is living his sister's childhood as he would've liked to or the one which he shows intentions of getting married. I admit, these moments might make the movie sappy and a little longer than some would like, but they certainly added to the second dimension of Viju's character - that which makes him likeable despite his mean streak.
Yet, it doesn't mean there were layers to various characters that were fascinating to peel off. A couple of dimensions from each character were chosen and they were given definite shape - enough to keep you engaged.
Yet, plugging some holes from the original doesn't mean new ones aren't created. Some things came too easily to Viju and some events needed better explanation.
But, today's Agneepath was still a better version for me while retaining a lot of what I loved about the 90s. More importantly, this Agneepath loses the unnecessary comic relief and doesn't glamorize itself with the oh-so opportune exotic locations. Now the question, what about the people who either belong to that 1990-Agneepath cult or have never seen it, so they have nothing to compare it to?
- meetu, a part of the audience
If you cannot see a video above, click here to see it on YouTube
Comments (42)
Hi Meetu,
Your preview seems quite positive. For me the trailer gives an impression of someone wanting to make a heavily violent film and using remake of agneepath as an excuse !
ligne
A very expected article trying to downplay Hrithik's potential as an actor(which you've been trying unsuccessfully for the last 5 years). I'm sure u would have noticed that the 2012 VDC is a completely different character from the 1990 VDC. Yet u wanna be comparing the two of them? I can already predict your rating for this one. I'm sure it won't be more than 2.5
P.S. : Kindly ask someone else to review Hrithik movies 'coz u make a hash of even the excellent ones like Jodhaa Akbar and Guzaarish!
@ligne I don't mind violence as long as it is not for the sake of violence. Also, the eternal filmy optimist in me is hoping for and looking forward to the changes from the original.
@Anuj I do have my reservations against Hrithik's acting capabilities but I gave Guzaarish a 'add to must watch list' rating - just pointing out. :D
If HR's a mediocre actor by bollywood's standards then who according to u is good huh? Salman?Or SRK....lmao!! And please don't mention kiddos like Ranbir and Imran. If at all there's anyone who's had variety and variation in performances(after Aamir) its only HR. Looking at Fiza,Mission Kashmir,KMG,Lakshya,Jodha Akbar,Guzaarish,ZNMD and now Agneepath you would know what i mean.
Anuj, no point arguing with her. The movies that she likes 99.999% of India doesn't and vice versa. She even criticized Hrithiks performance in Zindagi.... Guzaarish was the only exception I think.
@Sunil Haila! For ZNMD i remember saying, i'd be nit-picking if i complained about Hrithik Roshan because he did a good job too...BTW, Agneepath review is out. And I liked him here too! :D
About being in 0.001% people liking a film, it's cool. not everyone has to like what i like and vice versa. as long as the review helps you make a decision.
@meetu : "About being in 0.001% people liking a film, it's cool. not everyone has to like what i like and vice versa"
I hope you don't mean to say that u loath movies like RDB,Lagaan,Munnabhai,TZP,Deewar,Sholay,Zanjeer,Mr.India etc while you consider Ra.One,Mela,Veer,Yuvraaj,Khuda Gawah,RGV Ki Aag etc to be classics ;) :P
Nothing new in this movie. Typical story from old Indian movies. The original was the same, but it had Amitabh. The new one isn't even as stylish. It feels like it is actually set in 90s. Can't believe there's so much hype for this movie.
4
The only thing that appealed to me from Mukul Anand's Agneepath was the character of Vijay Deenanath Chauhan. Note: I said 'character' and not the portrayal of it by Amitabh Bachchan, his national award for it notwithstanding. If I had to remake Agneepath, and I could pick any actor in the history of time to play Vijay, I would pick Hrithik. His eyes emote like few others. But I would try and stay faithful to the 'character' of Vijay from Mukul Anand's version. Karan Malhotra's Agneepath is definitely watchable. However, if you strip it down to bare bones, I feel Vijay's character is very weakly written. For example, there is absolutely no reason for him to be a partner with Rauf Lala for 15 years while he pimps girls. That is a straight disconnect from one of the prime character traits of what makes Vijay as a character truly interesting. 'Agneepath' as a concept still awaits a film that is worthy of it.
@Pradeep Ditto about VDC from the 1990 Agneepath, as in that character the only thing I liked about the film. I thought the 2012-VDC was biding his time. Waiting to make sure he could overthrow Lala successfully because he would get only one strike. Lala indeed induced more fear than the four cartoons from the 1990 film, put together. That reminds me what was that about the 1990-VDC going and getting butchered in his 'maut ke saath appinment' I first thought it was some sort of a test for the foursome, but it just doesn't make sense. Anyway...
@Anuj :P good one!
"Lala indeed induced more fear than the four cartoons from the 1990 film, put together"....lol so true. But there were some moments in the 1990 Agneepath that were pure magic! The intro scene of Amitabh,the scene with his mother when he visits her place for dinner,the scene where he goes to the goons hideout to rescue his sister and roars "Dekho,Socho..ye ladka chingaari!!" and the climax where he's reciting the Agneepath poem. The problem with the older one was that it was over the top and certain aspects of the movie were completely illogical and senseless. Add to that the caricatures of Neelam and Mithun to make matters worse. The new Agneepath is a lot more polished and refined film while retaining the magic of the 70's and 80's revenge sagas(Deewaar anyone?). Hrithik's restrained yet brilliant as VDC while Dutt tries a bit too hard appearing a bit fake in the process(a far cry from his menacing KhalNayak and Vaastav versions)Gimme Danny as Kancha anyday. Rishi and Chikni Chameli are undoubtedly the USP.Could never imagine baby faced Rishi pulling off something like this. Time for his son to try something similar i guess!!
@Meetu : Did you ever feel that the original Agneepath was a wannabe and a dumbed down version of Deewar(the greatest bollywood movie according to me,even better than Sholay)?
If it's made for entertainment purpose then i give it thumbs down , if it's for social injustice or moral aspects i might give it a two thumbs .Bascially if movies contains both of the ingredient it makes a good match . I didn't had any expectation as the 1990 film is my favorite but now that it's has been rated by one of the critics who seems very genuine and fair to me, i won't go to PVR maybe a dvdrip will work.
@ Pradeep Menon "For example, there is absolutely no reason for him to be a partner with Rauf Lala for 15 years while he pimps girls." When a 12 yr old Vijay killed police officer it says all. It showed he is using Rauf lala only as ladder to reach at Kancha...not at MANDWA...here its a big difference between OLD Agneepath and NEW Agneepath....In old agneepath Vijay only wants Mandwa and send Kancha behind the bar but in new agneepath,he wants to kill KANCHA...So he is coldblooded and heartless towards every thing.
I believe any re-creation of a previous work as a tribute to it is guided by the fact that the original work is considered as a great work/classic/epic. A classic is a classic because the story being told and the way it's been told is eternal and still inspires artists and audience alike. Most of us would agree that we do not remember more than the baritone delivering "Vijay Deenanath Chauhan" and possibly the lines from HRB's poem. So in my opinion, the original film was in itself never an epic/classic 'coz if it had been, most of us would be motivated to watch it again every time it came on TV (which happened till a few years ago. Meeta I'm sure you would have made an active attempt to watch it again before comparing with the new one). And I would somehow relate to Anuj's comparison with Deewar by saying that it actually was a reflection of all the revenge stories (with mostly AB in it) that existed during the late 70s & whole of 80s but were clearly reaching their fag end in the early 90s. So, the relevance of the style of storytelling and the story itself, even for that era, is debatable. So, here you're trying to re-create, by and large, a non-epic, that too with the same style of storytelling, (I'd agree some irrelevant portions have been kept at bay), which to me doesn't lend too much to appreciate. I wonder, if the same story could be re-created keeping current sensibilities in mind and thereby taking the story and the characters to an altogether different platform where a larger audience would be able to engage with it. Paying tribute to a certain kind of storytelling technique would be attractive if it is able to generate the same magic as it originally created.
I thought it was a good one, should have been rated 'must watch' if you compare it to the other crappy films that Bollywood comes out with. Coming to the movie - A lot of violence could have been avoided. Rishi Kapoor's character seemed unnecessary. Also, I didn't get the point of VDC trying to take over Lala's position, his empire and then going to Mandwa all alone to meet Kancha!
Karan, your movie agneepath may be minting gold at box office, but you got all wrong this time, your thought of a cross breed of a lion [amitji] n a cheetah[rhtk],is inapt, you put all power of a lion,n took away it's roar,in one line your movie is a "lion without the roar "
The movie was strictly OK! Some things just didnt make sense - like if Hrithik Roshan had to go in alone for the final fight, why does he have to scheme around to become the king of Mumbai. Also overall Hrithik's role was too soft - never felt like he was on some vengence path. The kid did a better job to convey that feeling. I think the Director got confused about how to portay the adult Vijay Dinanath Chauhan. Special Effects and Background music was good. Sanjay Dutt was brilliant.
Nice review! This one surpassed my expectations - definitely worth a watch!
@Anuj agreed with all except Danny as Kancha. I didn't think he was menacing at all. That doesn't mean Sanjay Dutt did the do. It needed a more Gabbar like performance. Speaking of which, now that's a revenge saga too, Sholay. I never thought of Agneepath as watered down Deewar, so it's an interesting take. For most parts, I think of Deewar as a philosophical revenge. Vijay wasn't really seeking out Samant (is it?) to kill him. But ultimately, all revenge stories pan out the same. So, I can see where you are coming from.
@guddu ouch! Wait till it's officially out on DVD/Satellite? No?
@Mudit I don't know about paying tribute to a style of film-making, I don't think they were paying tribute. They were using that style to tell their story, and I thought they did a pretty good job of it. Similarly, I didn't think the remake was to pay a tribute, it was to showcase their interpretation of various characters.
@Vineet Really? I thought the violence is what gave the characters their identity. VDC needed to be in a position to sell Kancha's drugs in Mumbai, the only way he could do it was by taking over Lala's empire, because Lala wouldn't allow anyone else including his arch rival.
@rajsinghavi ha ha ha. 'lion without roar' says what you felt about the film to perfection!
@Pritesh Again, because there is no other way for VDC to sell Kancha's drugs in Mumbai. Lala and Commissioner Gaitonde, in their own right, didn't allow Kancha to enter Mumbai.
I mean the original Agneepath had "shades" of Deewar. For instance the story of a righteous man being wronged by an evil society and his son taking the wrong path to seek revenge(against his mother's wishes). The strained mother-son relationship in both the films is quite similar. The only thing missing in Agneepath was the brother angle(which too was tried to some extent courtesy Mithun's character,a very unsuccessful and needless character that). Sholay too is a revenge saga but that's a completely different type. And no i don't agree that all revenge dramas end up being similar. Think about something like Ghajini for a while. There's no resemblance to the likes of Deewar/Agneepath. Revenge stories like Sholay,Deewar/Agneepath and Ghajini are chalk and cheese.
And on Kancha,i don't think the original Kancha was even meant to be menacing. He was more of a suave,stylish and sophisticated gangster and was exceptionally portrayed by Danny. Dutt on the other hand was more like those heartless,evil and menacing "villains" of film folklore. I don't think Danny's Kancha was ever meant to be a traditional "villain",if you know what i mean.
@Mudit Yes, of course, I did a revision by watching Agneepath 1990 again before watching this one :D I was getting curious about the 'cult' status that the 1990 film had earned even before the remake was announced, so I might have watched it anyway, but I doubt it would have been so soon. It would be a 'some day' program. :D
@Anuj By ultimately the same, I'm painting with a very broad brush of course. Going by the theory that there are only 7 original stories in the world. :D
And Kancha, I need my villains to make me scared for my hero's life. I want to convince my hero (and him to refuse of course) not to engage him and let bygones be bygones, which is what Danny didn't do.
Both Mayank Shekhar and Rajeev Masand gave the movie 3/5. Then how's it that one is a so-so while the other is a thumbs up?
And btw,another revenge story almost identical to Deewar that immediately comes to my mind is Baazigar(except for a few more twists). A son seeking revenge for his father's death,becoming a criminal/murderer/gangster in the process and ending up dying in his mother's arms is a theme we bollywood buffs would never have enough of :D
@Anuj i think it all depends on whether the film has been done well or not, even if it's the same thing over and over again.
About External Reviews - 1. for 3/5, it depends on how the text reads. 2. If the text isn't a clear indicator, i tend to make one the lower rating and the other a greater rating.
You mean you actually read and analyze each and every text so carefully! :-O Ur one hell of a patient lady :D
"I need my villains to make me scared for my hero's life. I want to convince my hero (and him to refuse of course) not to engage him and let bygones be bygones, which is what Danny didn't do."
Now how exactly would you feel scared for an angry,venomous 6 feet 3 inch,red eyed Amitabh Bachchan mouthing his dialogues with utmost fury as though all hell's gonna break loose! The "Vijay Dinanath Chavan" dialogue of Amitabh would itself be enough to make even Gabbar and Mogambo sweat :D
@Anuj nope! I'm no super-woman, I skim through the reviews quickly. And go by the overall impression I get.
And about Amitabh Bachchan as VDC - point taken! :D
great movie, Fantastic acting by hritik, sanju, rishi, good songs, good screenplay and great direction.
Must watch.
haven't watched the movie ...but in case if the movie can inititae such a long discussion .. and that too surprisingly not about 'chikni chameli' ... then i should go and watch it soon .....
@Vishal that's true :P
Agneepath can be divided into 3 parts. Part 1 and 3 revolves around Hritik and his hometwon Manda and part 2 has a Mumbai flavor in it. The story is being held together by Rishi Kapoor who has worked amazingly in this film. I have never seen Rishi Kapoor doing such kind of villanious role but I must say he was superb. Hritik was nice and he has done all that he could do. Sanjay Dutt gave pure justice to his character. The role of Priyanka Chopra was a little weak but overall the movie is nice.
Disappointing film.....eventhough i am a hrithik fan.
Damn Story....bad direction....bakwaas sentiments....not an entertainer....
waste of money!!!!!!
wt happened to Hindi movies ????? !!!!!!.... y the standard of hindi movies are going down
poor film......saw agneepath with much excitement.....Disappointed, disappointed...disappointed........Directors must learn to direct well from South Director Shankar.
No good script writer left in Hindi Industry.????.....poor film...
Bakwaas movie
The movie is really awesome....brilliant.. Thanks! karan malhotra,& kj..
I can't think that,what kind of actor he(Hrithik,Vijay Dinanath Chauhan)is...he is just..just superb..mindblowing..superb!.really HRITHIK is proud of agneepath. and besides,Sanjay dutt's look in this movie,fantastic... awesome.I think this Agneepath is so much better,more fantastic than 1990's agneepath...overall the movie is fantastic..
That Master Dinanath Chauhan's suicide was converted to murder from the original Agneepath to this one. Because the fighter in him, wouldn't have committed suicide most likely.
I guess u didn't watch the film properly... In the original Agneepath Alok Nath didn't commit suicide but was killed by villagers
Original Agneepath was a great film though some scenes were stupid like Mithun's character
Amitabh's diff voice and also the way the film was handled didn't go well with the audiences
This film is treated like a 80s film but the film is good... Rishi's character was superbly treated, He did a superb job also another plus is that the film keptthe revenge angle alive and nice twists
Sanju baba welcome back after faltu films and Rishi is awesome.... Hrithik too did a great job
The emotional scene between Hrithik and priyanka till the end looked so forced and stupid also in the original Amitabh running through the fire in the climax was awesome... in this the impact was thanda also dialogues by vijay were not too great
Still dont know how Priyanka got shot..... when Vijay saved her first and took her behind the wall
55
Leave a new comment